| From: | Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh(at)pop(dot)jaring(dot)my> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "Arnaud Lesauvage" <thewild(at)freesurf(dot)fr>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Best high availability solution ? |
| Date: | 2006-05-31 13:42:05 |
| Message-ID: | 5.2.1.1.1.20060531214029.034c03a0@localhost |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
At 10:38 AM 5/31/2006 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>Since you're a Windows shop, you may already have the experience (and
>even liceneses perhaps?) to run Microsoft Cluster Service (part of 2003
>Enterprise Edition or 2000 Advanced Server). PostgreSQL will work fine
>with it. Works with shared disks using either fibrechannel or iSCSI.
Are you sure that will really work?
I thought Postgresql requires shared memory amongst the processes. Is that
not true on the Windows platform?
Does Microsoft Cluster Service somehow help with that?
Regards,
Link.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-05-31 13:51:12 | Re: Best high availability solution ? |
| Previous Message | Arnaud Lesauvage | 2006-05-31 13:40:15 | Re: Best high availability solution ? |