Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Benchmark

From: Patrick Meylemans <Patrick(dot)Meylemans(at)wtcm(dot)be>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>,Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Benchmark
Date: 2005-02-13 19:24:22
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance

We are using PostgreSQL for 4 Years now, one can say it is a blessing to 
maintain. Our previous database was number one (;-), it was much harder to 
maintain so labor is a pro for PostgreSQL ...

Kind Regards

Patrick Meylemans

IT Manager
Celestijnenlaan 300C
3001 Helerlee

At 11:34 13/02/2005 -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
>Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> writes:
> > After all, the cost of a computer system to run the transactions is
> > likely to be comprised of some combination of software licenses and
> > hardware costs.  Even if the software is free, the hardware isn't.
>And labour costs.
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Jaime CasanovaDate: 2005-02-13 21:27:45
Subject: estimated rows vs. actual rows
Previous:From: Greg StarkDate: 2005-02-13 16:34:54
Subject: Re: Benchmark

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group