| From: | Patrick Meylemans <Patrick(dot)Meylemans(at)wtcm(dot)be> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Benchmark |
| Date: | 2005-02-13 19:24:22 |
| Message-ID: | 5.2.1.1.0.20050213202121.029592b8@server04.site04.wtcm.be |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Dear,
We are using PostgreSQL for 4 Years now, one can say it is a blessing to
maintain. Our previous database was number one (;-), it was much harder to
maintain so labor is a pro for PostgreSQL ...
Kind Regards
Patrick Meylemans
IT Manager
WTCM-CRIF
Celestijnenlaan 300C
3001 Helerlee
At 11:34 13/02/2005 -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
>Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> writes:
>
> > After all, the cost of a computer system to run the transactions is
> > likely to be comprised of some combination of software licenses and
> > hardware costs. Even if the software is free, the hardware isn't.
>
>And labour costs.
>
>--
>greg
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2005-02-13 21:27:45 | estimated rows vs. actual rows |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2005-02-13 16:34:54 | Re: Benchmark |