Re: PQunescapeBytea tweak

From: Adam Kavan <akavan(at)cox(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PQunescapeBytea tweak
Date: 2003-10-31 17:05:38
Message-ID: 5.2.1.1.0.20031031110406.00ab5540@pop.central.cox.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

At 09:57 PM 10/30/03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>What compiler and optimization settings are you using, and what is the
>hardware platform? It seems strange to me that you would get any
>noticeable speedup from this change. Most C compilers are supposed to
>be reasonably smart about optimizing subscripted pointers.

Whoops, my code was linking against an old 7.3.x version of libpq, the
speed is the same compared to 7.4.

--- Adam Kavan
--- akavan(at)cox(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-10-31 21:56:12 Re: "make check" improvement for cygwin
Previous Message Larry Rosenman 2003-10-31 15:38:25 UnixWare UP3 compiler detection patch