From: | Ernest E Vogelsinger <ernest(at)vogelsinger(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com> |
Cc: | jim(at)nasby(dot)net, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: RE : full featured alter table? |
Date: | 2003-06-16 14:27:50 |
Message-ID: | 5.1.1.6.2.20030616162610.02d3ebc0@mail.vogelsinger.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
At 16:21 16.06.2003, Mike Mascari said:
--------------------[snip]--------------------
>It's that last sentence:
>
>"The columns are referenced in the ascending sequence of their ordinal
>position within T."
>
>As Tom pointed out earlier, it may not make sense purely from a
>relational point of view, but it is required by the standard. Given
>that it is required, it would be nice if the user could modify the
>ordinal position within T.
Thanks for clearing this up! I had the perception column sequence was not
mentioned at all - too much time since I last read that stuff...
>TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Yes, but how much, and to what point? (not directed to you, but...)
--
>O Ernest E. Vogelsinger
(\) ICQ #13394035
^ http://www.vogelsinger.at/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2003-06-16 14:32:43 | Re: [HACKERS] SAP and MySQL ... [and Benchmark] |
Previous Message | Mike Mascari | 2003-06-16 14:21:14 | Re: RE : full featured alter table? |