Re: bit strings - anyone working on them?

From: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bit strings - anyone working on them?
Date: 2003-04-24 01:37:23
Message-ID: 5.1.0.14.0.20030424113704.02a564b0@mail.rhyme.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 07:55 PM 23/04/2003 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>All things considered, it was probably a good idea that they removed bit
>strings in SQL200x.

Did they replace them with any kind of open-ended bit vector?

----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 03 5330 3172 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-04-24 02:59:50 Re: query optimization scenarios 17,701 times faster!!!
Previous Message Philip Yarra 2003-04-24 00:24:25 Re: ECPG thread-safety