| From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Giles Lean <giles(at)nemeton(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? |
| Date: | 2002-10-22 11:46:25 |
| Message-ID: | 5.1.0.14.0.20021022214306.02ff6f48@mail.rhyme.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 10:16 AM 21/10/2002 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>What are
>the odds that dumping the bytes in it, in either order, will produce
>something that's compatible with any other platform?
None, but it will be compatible with itself (the most we can hope for), and
will work even if shifting is not supported for off_t (how likely is
that?). I agree shift is definitely the way to go if it works on arbitrary
data - ie. it does not rely on off_t being an integer. Can I shift a struct?
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-10-22 13:24:30 | Re: New SET/autocommit problem |
| Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2002-10-22 09:50:21 | Re: Current CVS is broken |