Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?

From: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "PostgreSQL Development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Date: 2002-10-01 23:42:16
Message-ID: 5.1.0.14.0.20021002093409.04457f78@mail.rhyme.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 09:59 AM 1/10/2002 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>If there is a problem, seems like we'd better fix it. Perhaps there
>needs to be something in the header to tell the reader the sizeof
>off_t.

Yes, and do the peripheral stuff to support old archives etc. We also need
to be careful about the places where we do file-position-arithmetic - if
there are any, I can't recall.

I am not sure we need to worry about whether zlib supports large files
since I am pretty sure we don't use zlib for file IO - we just pass it
in-memory blocks; so it should work no matter how much data is in the stream.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Warner 2002-10-01 23:54:13 Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-10-01 22:10:57 Re: 7.2.3 patching done