Re: DataBlades

From: elein <elein(at)nextbus(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "'pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DataBlades
Date: 2002-04-15 21:29:21
Message-ID: 5.1.0.14.0.20020415142514.02435008@office.nextbus.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hey, you never know. The DataBlade name may be up for
grabs if IBM sticks with "extenders". We *know* the name
itself never defined anything specific.

PostgreSQL's catchy word for it is "contrib" anyway.

elein(at)nextbus(dot)com
and not or

At 04:44 PM 4/15/2002 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Does PostgreSQL support the integration of extension packages like
> >> Informix' Datablades, Oracle's Cartridges or IBM's Extenders?
>
>There's plenty of extensibility in the system ... however, we lack
>a catchy name for it ;-)
>
> regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Timothy Wood 2002-04-15 21:34:48 Re: using CAST and LIKE
Previous Message Dmitry Tkach 2002-04-15 21:25:40 Re: Alter/update large tables - VERRRY annoying behaviour!