From: | "Tim Finch, FosterFinch Ltd" <tim(at)fosterfinch(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Steve Slatcher" <steve_slatcher(at)scientia(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL and Cygwin as production database |
Date: | 2002-04-05 12:10:42 |
Message-ID: | 5.1.0.14.0.20020405130943.05882428@mail.cix.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-cygwin |
I have no experience of production systems on Windows but I noted somewhere
in this column recently someone ran into a 62 concurrent session maximum
down to some bug or limit in Cygwin, which you might want to look into, if
you expect high simultaneous hit rate onto the postmaster...
At 11:28 05/04/2002 +0100, Steve Slatcher wrote:
>Hi all
>
>Would anyone share experiences and/or thoughts about the use of PostgreSQL
>on Cygwin in a production environment ? Leaving aside, for now at least,
>why I
>would want to do it!
>
>I am aware that it does not install as Windows sysadmins might expect, but
>was wondering about issues like performace and reliability cf other platforms.
>
>Steve Slatcher
>
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
>message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Tim Finch,
FosterFinch Ltd
http://www.fosterfinch.co.uk
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stefan Nobis | 2002-04-07 12:29:52 | libpq not working |
Previous Message | Steve Slatcher | 2002-04-05 10:28:06 | PostgreSQL and Cygwin as production database |