Re: Slow alter sequence with PG10.1

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Krüger <michael(at)kruegers(dot)email>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Slow alter sequence with PG10.1
Date: 2018-01-22 22:51:04
Message-ID: 4fef32b4-37da-2c6f-d6ea-0f80e5cb62e7@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 1/22/18 17:11, Michael Krüger wrote:
> I do not fully understand the reasoning of making sequences
> transactional in the first place.

It was sequence DDL that was made transactional. Sequence use is still
nontransactional.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2018-01-22 23:40:54 Re: Slow alter sequence with PG10.1
Previous Message Michael Krüger 2018-01-22 22:47:15 Re: Slow alter sequence with PG10.1