Re: Some incorrect comments and out-dated README from run-time pruning

On 27/09/2018 23:20, David Rowley wrote:
> I've noticed that the comments above the PartitionedRelPruneInfo
> struct incorrectly document how subplan_map and subpart_map are
> indexed. This seems to have snuck in on 4e232364033.

- * subplan_map[] and subpart_map[] are indexed by partition index (where
- * zero is the topmost partition, and non-leaf partitions must come before
- * their children). For a leaf partition p, subplan_map[p] contains the
+ * subplan_map[] and subpart_map[] are indexed by partition index (as
defined
+ * in the PartitionDesc). For a leaf partition p, subplan_map[p]
contains the

I don't see what someone reading this comment would do with "as defined
in the PartitionDesc". I don't see any PartitionDesc referenced or
mentioned at or near that struct.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services