Re:Re: Re:Re: Re: [BUGS] Return value error of‘to_timestamp’

From: 甄明洋 <zhenmingyang(at)yeah(dot)net>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Aleksander Alekseev" <a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re:Re: Re:Re: Re: [BUGS] Return value error of‘to_timestamp’
Date: 2016-08-18 09:57:48
Message-ID: 4f215f75.1a4e.1569d15d349.Coremail.zhenmingyang@yeah.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Aha i got it. thanks.
Why don't use a unified time zone Convention ?

If user is not particularly familiar with the document,
Maybe will feel confused.

At 2016-08-17 21:49:38, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>=?UTF-8?B?55SE5piO5rSL?= <zhenmingyang(at)yeah(dot)net> writes:
>> this looks like, the sign plus and minus are inverted, i dont understand why?
>
>Time zone names follow the POSIX convention (plus is west of Greenwich).
>Timestamp I/O follows the ISO convention (plus is east of Greenwich).
>Aren't standards fun?
>
>See para starting "One should be wary ..." here:
>https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/datatype-datetime.html#DATATYPE-TIMEZONES
>
> regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2016-08-18 10:07:14 Re: BUG #14243: pg_basebackup failes by a STATUS_DELETE_PENDING file
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-08-18 01:45:38 Re: BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple