Re: Unexpected sequential scan on an indexed column

From: Eddy Escardo-Raffo <eescardo(at)kikini(dot)com>
To: Dave Crooke <dcrooke(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unexpected sequential scan on an indexed column
Date: 2009-11-16 20:45:46
Message-ID: 4eaa4a5e0911161245o9683f6vab4c00c5623c2ff3@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Yeah this kind of thing would probably work. Doing this in java with
separate queries would be easy to code but require multiple round trips.
Doing it as a stored procedure would be nicer but I'd have to think a little
more about how to refactor the java code around the query to make this
happen. Thanks for the suggestion.

Eddy

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Dave Crooke <dcrooke(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi Eddy
>
> Perhaps a slightly naive suggestion .... have you considered
> converting the query to a small stored procedure ('function' in
> Postgres speak)? You can pull the location values, and then iterate
> over a query like this:
>
> select userid from users where location=:x
>
> which is more-or-less guaranteed to use the index.
>
>
> I had a somewhat similar situation recently, where I was passing in a
> list of id's (from outwith Postgres) and it would on occasion avoid
> the index in favour of a full table scan .... I changed this to
> iterate over the id's with separate queries (in Java, but using a
> function will achieve the same thing) and went from one 5 minute query
> doing full table scan to a handful of queries doing sub-millisecond
> direct index lookups.
>
> Cheers
> Dave
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2009-11-16 20:50:39 Re: Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe?
Previous Message Robert Schnabel 2009-11-16 20:32:51 Re: Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe?