Re: Should smgrdounlink() be removed?

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should smgrdounlink() be removed?
Date: 2020-05-07 07:57:00
Message-ID: 4e53258d-d394-b23b-cb24-89812ca3675c@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020/05/07 13:49, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 09:48:35AM +0530, vignesh C wrote:
>> I could not find any code reference to smgrdounlink, I feel it can be
>> removed.
>
> The last use of smgrdounlink() was b416691. I have just looked at
> Debian Code Search and github, and could not find a hit with the
> function being used in some custom extension code, so it feels like a
> safe bet to remove it.

+1

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erik Nordström 2020-05-07 08:11:14 Feedback on table expansion hook (including patch)
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2020-05-07 07:51:16 Re: Why are wait events not reported even though it reads/writes a timeline history file?