Re: Using logical replication with older version subscribers

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Using logical replication with older version subscribers
Date: 2019-01-07 12:48:40
Message-ID: 4e1b30fe-f790-b567-6e9a-1808dc9229f6@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 07/01/2019 10:54, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I assume you are not suggesting a publication with truncation enabled
> should just ignore replicating truncation if the downstream server
> doesn't support it? Because if that's the suggestion, then a strong -1
> from me on that. 

Yes, that's the reason why we intentionally left it as it is now.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-01-07 12:59:58 Re: START/END line number for COPY FROM
Previous Message Nikolay Shaplov 2019-01-07 12:04:08 Problem with parallel_workers option (Was Re: [PATCH] get rid of StdRdOptions, use individual binary reloptions representation for each relation kind instead)