| From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Marina Polyakova <m(dot)polyakova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |
| Date: | 2018-05-10 00:48:50 |
| Message-ID: | 4e12d3cf-309b-8c77-7cc1-0d6847c20709@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018/05/09 22:43, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Amit Langote wrote:
>> On 2018/05/09 11:31, David Rowley wrote:
>>> On 9 May 2018 at 14:29, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>>> On 2018/05/09 11:20, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>>>> While looking at this code, is there any reason to not make
>>>>> gen_partprune_steps static? This is only used in partprune.c for now,
>>>>> so the intention is to make it available for future patches?
>
>> Here is a patch that does that.
>
> Pushed, thanks.
Thank you.
Regards,
Amit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-05-10 01:02:03 | Re: Indexes on partitioned tables and foreign partitions |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-05-09 22:55:55 | Re: Postgres, fsync, and OSs (specifically linux) |