Re: Add compiler option -fstrict-flex-arrays=1

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Tristan Partin <tristan(at)partin(dot)io>
Cc: Greg Burd <greg(at)burd(dot)me>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Geier <geidav(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Add compiler option -fstrict-flex-arrays=1
Date: 2026-10-28 08:04:13
Message-ID: 4de849f7-8091-4285-8f7a-87c8ffe1ddee@eisentraut.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 27.10.26 16:51, Tristan Partin wrote:
> We could define a pg_attribute_strict_flex_array() macro and add it to
> the entry in WordEntryPosVector1. We can add a comment to the macro
> indicating how and why it should be used since it'll likely be a little
> non-obvious, but we could continue to keep bounds checking on
> WordEntryPosVector1.

Something like in the attached patch 0002?

(Patch 0001 is unchanged.)

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-Add-compiler-option-fstrict-flex-arrays-1.patch text/plain 8.4 KB
v2-0002-squash-Add-compiler-option-fstrict-flex-arrays-1.patch text/plain 3.0 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2026-10-28 08:04:38 Re: [PATCH] Remove unused PageIsPredicateLocked()
Previous Message Julien Riou 2026-10-28 07:57:51 Re: PROXY protocol support