Re: pg_upgrade: Pass -j down to vacuumdb

From: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: "Jamison, Kirk" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade: Pass -j down to vacuumdb
Date: 2019-01-28 16:47:37
Message-ID: 4ce565f9-d21f-039f-8f5a-2e16e6aa1ae4@redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/28/19 11:30 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> IMHO you should use long option name '--jobs' like others.
>

Thanks for your feedback !

Done, and v4 attached.

Best regards,
Jesper

Attachment Content-Type Size
v4_0001-Highlight-that-the-jobs-option-isn-t-passed-down-to-.patch text/x-patch 3.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2019-01-28 16:47:39 Re: Allowing extensions to supply operator-/function-specific info
Previous Message Robert Haas 2019-01-28 16:40:15 Re: pgsql: Remove references to Majordomo