| From: | Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Speed up clean meson builds by ~25% |
| Date: | 2024-04-08 09:00:00 |
| Message-ID: | 4cd2ec84-609c-e701-75d1-0153b2c10b57@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Jelte,
08.04.2024 11:36, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 10:00, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> As I wrote in [1], I didn't observe the issue with clang-18, so maybe it
>> is fixed already.
>> Perhaps it's worth rechecking...
> Using the attached script I got these timings. Clang is significantly
> slower in all of them. But especially with -Og the difference between
> is huge.
>
> gcc 11.4.0: 7.276s
> clang 18.1.3: 17.216s
> gcc 11.4.0 --debug: 7.441s
> clang 18.1.3 --debug: 18.164s
> gcc 11.4.0 --debug -Og: 2.418s
> clang 18.1.3 --debug -Og: 14.864s
>
> I reported this same issue to the LLVM project here:
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/87973
Maybe we're talking about different problems.
At [1] Thomas (and then I) was unhappy with more than 200 seconds
duration...
Best regards,
Alexander
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2024-04-08 09:08:29 | Re: remaining sql/json patches |
| Previous Message | Jelte Fennema-Nio | 2024-04-08 08:59:17 | Re: Speed up clean meson builds by ~25% |