Re: proposal: variadic argument support for least, greatest function

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: proposal: variadic argument support for least, greatest function
Date: 2019-03-11 17:04:42
Message-ID: 4cad2f09-22d6-379b-8026-9d208c3e7aab@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/11/19 6:43 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 3/6/19 10:24 AM, Chapman Flack wrote:
>> On 3/6/19 10:12 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>>> Having reviewed the thread, I'm with Andres and Tom. Maybe though we
>>> should have a note somewhere to the effect that you can't use VARIADIC
>>> with these.
>> Perhaps such a note belongs hoisted into the functions-conditional
>> section of the manual, making a general observation that these things
>> are conditional *expressions* that may resemble functions, but in
>> particular, COALESCE, GREATEST, and LEAST cannot be called with
>> keyword VARIADIC and an array argument, as they could if they were
>> ordinary functions.
>>
>
>
> I'm going to mark this as rejected. Here's a possible doc patch

+1

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2019-03-11 17:20:21 Re: pgbench MAX_ARGS
Previous Message Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker 2019-03-11 17:04:03 Re: pgbench MAX_ARGS