| From: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Code of Conduct plan |
| Date: | 2018-06-08 09:18:36 |
| Message-ID: | 4c23312d36e8e99878d440ba85023049@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On 2018-06-08 09:46, Simon Riggs wrote:
<snip>
> Would it not be better to consider arbitration as the first step in
> dispute resolution?
This bit sounds like it'd need to be on a case-by-case basis.
It's pretty easy to imagine scenarios where arbitration wouldn't be
appropriate.
Whether or not they come about in the PG Community or not is a
different matter.
My point being that arbitration isn't necessarily automatically the
right direction.
I'd probably leave it up to the CoC team/people to figure it out. :)
+ Justin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Travers | 2018-06-08 09:53:54 | Re: Code of Conduct plan |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2018-06-08 08:46:57 | Re: Code of Conduct plan |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron | 2018-06-08 09:27:02 | Re: Can you make a simple view non-updatable? |
| Previous Message | Ryan Murphy | 2018-06-08 09:17:08 | Re: Can you make a simple view non-updatable? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Travers | 2018-06-08 09:53:54 | Re: Code of Conduct plan |
| Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2018-06-08 08:53:13 | Re: Concurrency bug in UPDATE of partition-key |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Khandekar | 2018-06-08 09:27:14 | Request for "editor" privilege for PostgreSQL Wiki page |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2018-06-08 08:46:57 | Re: Code of Conduct plan |