Re: What's your experience with using Postgres in IoT-contexts?

From: Diego <mrstephenamell(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What's your experience with using Postgres in IoT-contexts?
Date: 2020-10-05 14:51:17
Message-ID: 4bc3ebc4-2307-7b64-d0db-1d2b4d10c9a5@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I use pg in my raspberrypy 3b, for a weather station and works fine, but
to be honest, I have a sencond raspi with a pgbouncer and a pendrive of
256GBs as data storage

In other, I have a zabbix server with pg monitoring aboutn 100 devices,
but with an external hdd.

but, at the end of the day, I think is not the best idea.

On 2020-10-05 06:20, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> TL;DR:
>
> Does anyone actually use Postgres with ARM based low performance
> hardware and only 256 MiB of RAM? What are your experiences in other
> stripped down environments? Is there some lower RAM limit with which
> using Postgres doesn't make any sense anymore? Is Postgres able to
> compete with SQLite regaridng lower performance boundaries or is there
> some point at which SQLite will be the better choice, because Postgres
> needs some more resources to work properly?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Background:
>
> I have some server side backend exposing web services and storing data
> in Postgres. The stored data are telegrams from smart metering
> devices, lots of them, mostly small. The provided web services take
> care of generating reports etc. based on those telegrams.
>
> It's now considered to put large parts of that backend onto some ARM
> based IoT device, simply because that device would do a lot of the
> same things. The available backend is Java-based, so it would simply
> be possible as well and I already ran things on some Raspi-like
> hardware and things worked pretty well. OTOH, the targetted hardware
> is less capable than some Raspi, we talk about only 256 MiB of RAM
> currently. The exact details of the hardware are not clear yet.
>
> In the easiest case, the newly created device would only need to store
> some hundreds of telegrams per day in some known time window and
> forward those telegrams afterwards. In most cases it would be those of
> the same day only, but might be those of the last X few days as well
> in case of problems. In the long term, though, that device should be
> able to store telegrams for years and might generate reports on it's
> own as well.
>
> I've already found some interesting infos like the following, but
> would be interested in other expereinces as well.
>
> https://www.postgresql.eu/events/pgconfeu2019/sessions/session/2781/slides/251/PostgreSQL%20for%20IoT.pdf
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
>
> Thorsten Schöning
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-10-05 14:53:20 Re: UUID generation problem
Previous Message Mario Emmenlauer 2020-10-05 14:49:27 Re: dup(0) fails on Ubuntu 20.04 and macOS 10.15 with 13.0