| From: | Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vitali Xevet <vitalixevet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Clustering/fail-over solution |
| Date: | 2010-03-29 18:59:16 |
| Message-ID: | 4bb0f88e.0f0bca0a.1e5b.ffff9b0e@mx.google.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-novice |
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 07:30:25AM +0300, Vitali Xevet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What is the maturest clustering/fail-over solution that found acceptance
> by Postgres people, for Linux (Debian/CentOS)?
>
> Cheers
> Vitali Xevet
Several options are quite mature -- mature enough that you should base your
choice on features, supportability, etc., rather than which one is furthest
along. See this wiki page for more information:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Replication%2C_Clustering%2C_and_Connection_Pooling
--
Joshua Tolley / eggyknap
End Point Corporation
http://www.endpoint.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tyler Hains | 2010-03-29 20:35:09 | plpgsql function help |
| Previous Message | A. Kretschmer | 2010-03-29 07:44:14 | Re: Return row after a Insert |