Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table

From: Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>
To: Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rémi Lapeyre <remi(dot)lapeyre(at)lenstra(dot)fr>, Ryan Lambert <ryan(at)rustprooflabs(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Eli Marmor <eli(at)netmask(dot)it>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Georgios <gkokolatos(at)protonmail(dot)com>, Li Japin <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table
Date: 2021-03-10 17:02:53
Message-ID: 4ba71e76-c038-1e2a-19d7-d3c084902cf6@postgresfriends.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/10/21 5:49 PM, Surafel Temesgen wrote:
> hi Ibrar,
> thank you for rebasing
>
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 9:34 AM Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>>
>>> Since the get_row_start_time_col_name() and get_row_end_time_col_name()
>>> are similar, IMO we can pass a flag to get StartTime/EndTime column name,
>>> thought?
>>>
>>>
> For me your option is better. i will change to it in my next
> patch if no objection

I have plenty of objection. I'm sorry that I am taking so long with my
review. I am still working on it and it is coming soon, I promise.
--
Vik Fearing

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacob Champion 2021-03-10 17:05:38 Re: cryptohash: missing locking functions for OpenSSL <= 1.0.2?
Previous Message Surafel Temesgen 2021-03-10 16:58:16 Re: Evaluate expression at planning time for two more cases