Re: increased duration of stats_ext tests with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>
To: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: increased duration of stats_ext tests with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS
Date: 2025-12-06 12:04:20
Message-ID: 4b7657b7-7c81-45a4-9fd3-0448ec441590@vondra.me
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/6/25 10:00, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
> Hello Tomas,
>
> 03.12.2025 21:23, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> On 12/3/25 19:33, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I wrote:
>>>> Yeah, I can imagine that constantly flushing the cached plan for
>>>> that plpgsql function would be bad. Let me see if I can reformulate
>>>> that test without using a plpgsql function --- right offhand, it's
>>>> not obvious why a built-in function wouldn't serve the purpose
>>>> just as well.
>>> I pushed a change for this. On my Mac laptop, it brings the time
>>> for stats_ext with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS down to ~8 minutes, from
>>> I-didn't-have-the-patience-to-wait-but-it-would-have-been-hours.
>>>
>> Thanks!
>
> That change decreased the test duration on master:
> [1] ok 159       + stats_ext                              964154 ms
> vs
> [2] ok 157       + stats_ext                            16557572 ms
>
> but the test run still failed (and also fails on other branches, where the
> duration is moderate), probably because of the overall timeout changed
> somehow.
>
> The last good run on avocet, REL_15_STABLE [3] took 12:49:15, however all
> the failed runs timed out in 4 hours (14400 seconds):
> timedout [7e54eac] (03:59:27)
> timedout [7792bdc] (03:59:53)
> The difference between the last good run and the first bad one I see is:
> 'script_version' => 'REL_19_1',
> vs
> 'script_version' => 'REL_20',
> though I can't see timeout-related changes in [4], probably something was
> changed in the environment during the upgrade...
>

Yeah, I noticed that too. But I have no idea what could have changed or
why - the only thing I updated is the buildfarm client :-(

I initially thought it might be due to setting

use_installcheck_parallel => 1

but it still fails after reverting that change. I still have the
build-farm client v19.1 around, so I can try switching back to that.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marcos Pegoraro 2025-12-06 12:18:41 Initial COPY of Logical Replication is too slow
Previous Message Kirill Reshke 2025-12-06 11:53:41 Change comment in `contrib/amcheck` regression suite.