From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
Cc: | André Hänsel <andre(at)webkr(dot)de>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Two constraints with the same name not always allowed |
Date: | 2018-09-06 21:53:47 |
Message-ID: | 4a963af1-b199-ceae-6e55-804535bbf09b@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On 02/09/2018 19:00, Tom Lane wrote:
> This also points up the lack of a suitable unique index on pg_constraint.
> It's sort of difficult to figure out what that should look like given that
> pg_constraint contains two quasi-independent collections of constraints,
> but maybe UNIQUE(conrelid,contypid,conname) would serve given the
> reasonable assumption that exactly one of conrelid and contypid is zero.
Sketches for assertions set both conrelid and contypid to zero. I think
the unique constraint would have to include connamespace to support that
properly.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-09-06 21:58:36 | Re: BUG #15367: Crash in pg_fe_scram_free when using foreign tables |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-09-06 21:49:56 | Re: BUG #15358: PostgreSQL fails to build on 10.14 when Perl is enabled. |