| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM <satyanarlapuram(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres restart in the middle of exclusive backup and the presence of backup_label file |
| Date: | 2021-12-02 16:00:32 |
| Message-ID: | 4a363c5a-473f-9cb9-9f59-74a230575340@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/1/21 19:30, Bossart, Nathan wrote:
> On 12/1/21, 10:37 AM, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 12/1/21, 8:27 AM, "David Steele" <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
>>> On 11/30/21 18:31, Bossart, Nathan wrote:
>>>> Do you think it's still worth trying to make it safe, or do you think
>>>> we should just remove exclusive mode completely?
>>> My preference would be to remove it completely, but I haven't gotten a
>>> lot of traction so far.
>> In this thread, I count 6 people who seem alright with removing it,
>> and 2 who might be opposed, although I don't think anyone has
>> explicitly stated they are against it.
> I hastily rebased the patch from 2018 and got it building and passing
> the tests. I'm sure it will need additional changes, but I'll wait
> for more feedback before I expend too much more effort on this.
>
Should we really be getting rid of
PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster::backup_fs_hot() ?
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-12-02 17:30:45 | Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2021-12-02 15:56:02 | Re: Some RELKIND macro refactoring |