Re: Posix Shared Mem patch

On 6/26/12 2:13 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of mar jun 26 15:49:59 -0400 2012:
>>> Robert, all:
>>>
>>> Last I checked, we had a reasonably acceptable patch to use mostly Posix
>>> Shared mem with a very small sysv ram partition. Is there anything
>>> keeping this from going into 9.3? It would eliminate a major
>>> configuration headache for our users.
>>
>> I don't think that patch was all that reasonable. It needed work, and
>> in any case it needs a rebase because it was pretty old.
>
> Yep, agreed.
>
> I'd like to get this fixed too, but it hasn't made it up to the top of
> my list of things to worry about.

Was there a post-AgentM version of the patch, which incorporated the
small SySV RAM partition? I'm not finding it.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com