Re: libpq compression

From: Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "ktm(at)rice(dot)edu" <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Claes Jakobsson <claes(at)versed(dot)se>
Subject: Re: libpq compression
Date: 2012-06-26 15:29:33
Message-ID: 4FE9D55D.6030807@timbira.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 26-06-2012 12:23, Robert Haas wrote:
> At the risk of making everyone laugh at me, has anyone tested pglz? I
> observe that if the compression ration and performance are good, we
> might consider using it for this purpose, too, which would avoid
> having to add dependencies. Conversely, if they are bad, and we
> decide to support another algorithm, we might consider also using that
> other algorithm, at least optionally, for the purposes for which we
> now use pglz.
>
I'll remember to test it too.

--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira - Timbira http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-06-26 15:30:43 Re: How to avoid base backup in automated failover
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-06-26 15:28:23 Re: GiST subsplit question