From: | Evan Martin <postgresql(at)realityexists(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Please make it easy to drop a database that is in use |
Date: | 2012-06-21 13:51:18 |
Message-ID: | 4FE326D6.5040601@realityexists.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 21/06/2012 10:20 PM, Sergey Konoplev wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Evan Martin
> <postgresql(at)realityexists(dot)net> wrote:
>> 1) The workaround requires extra work for each developer (or at least each
>> client application) using PostgreSQL, while a fix in PostgreSQL would solve
>> this once and for all.
> It is not clean what database you need to reconnect automatically
> after the dropping. Moreover you may not have permissions to connect
> other databases.
That's a fair point, so perhaps DROP DATABASE should still fail if the
/current/ connection is to that database (preferably with a helpful
error like "you cannot drop the database you are connected to"). There
should be an easy way to close all /other/ connections to it, though.
>> 2) The workaround requires superuser privileges, which I don't think should
>> be required to drop your own database.
> It does not require it. You might also be an owner to drop the database.
It does when I try it:
SELECT pg_terminate_backend(procpid)
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE datname = 'dropme';
ERROR: must be superuser to signal other server processes
In this case the user was the owner of "dropme", but another user was
also connected to it. I believe that should not stop the owner from
dropping their database.
Regards,
Evan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Raghavendra | 2012-06-21 14:01:35 | Re: Please make it easy to drop a database that is in use |
Previous Message | Daniele Varrazzo | 2012-06-21 12:35:30 | Re: Reading storage parameters |