From: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "ktm(at)rice(dot)edu" <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: libpq compression |
Date: | 2012-06-15 20:08:58 |
Message-ID: | 4FDB965A.8040703@timbira.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 15-06-2012 11:10, ktm(at)rice(dot)edu wrote:
> I agree and think that the SSL-based compression is an excellent default
> compression scheme. The plugable compression approach allows for the
> choice of the most appropriate compression implementation based on the
> application needs. It really addresses corner cases such as high-
> performance system.
>
That is my opinion too. I'm free to use to most appropriate algorithm for
compression. It is just a matter of coding an interface for my favorite
compression algorithm. We could even add some algorithms in a new contrib module.
--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira - Timbira http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2012-06-15 20:18:09 | Re: [RFC][PATCH] Logical Replication/BDR prototype and architecture |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-06-15 20:06:35 | Re: sortsupport for text |