Re: libpq compression

From: Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
To: "ktm(at)rice(dot)edu" <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: libpq compression
Date: 2012-06-15 20:08:58
Message-ID: 4FDB965A.8040703@timbira.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 15-06-2012 11:10, ktm(at)rice(dot)edu wrote:
> I agree and think that the SSL-based compression is an excellent default
> compression scheme. The plugable compression approach allows for the
> choice of the most appropriate compression implementation based on the
> application needs. It really addresses corner cases such as high-
> performance system.
>
That is my opinion too. I'm free to use to most appropriate algorithm for
compression. It is just a matter of coding an interface for my favorite
compression algorithm. We could even add some algorithms in a new contrib module.

--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira - Timbira http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2012-06-15 20:18:09 Re: [RFC][PATCH] Logical Replication/BDR prototype and architecture
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-06-15 20:06:35 Re: sortsupport for text