| From: | Honza Horak <hhorak(at)redhat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Ability to listen on two unix sockets |
| Date: | 2012-06-15 12:10:21 |
| Message-ID: | 4FDB262D.70607@redhat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/13/2012 03:25 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
> Going through the thread, I'd like to sum it up choosing approach with
> less potential issues and would like to find a consensus if possible.
>
> It seems unix_socket_directory could be turned into list and probably
> renamed to unix_socket_directories, since it would be confusing if a
> list value is in singular. On the other hand, we probably don't want to
> specify listening ports together with additional unix sockets in one
> configuration option, so it seems better to add a new configuration
> option to distinguish the primary listening port from additional ports.
>
> Regards,
> Honza
A draft patch is attached. It renames unix_socket_directory to
unix_socket_directories and allows to use directory:port to be able to
create more sockets in one directory with different port number in the
socket name.
Regards,
Honza
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| multiple-socket-dirs.patch | text/x-patch | 25.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-06-15 12:13:04 | Re: [PATCH] Lazy hashaggregate when no aggregation is needed |
| Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2012-06-15 10:55:41 | Re: [PATCH] Lazy hashaggregate when no aggregation is needed |