Re: XLog changes for 9.3

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: XLog changes for 9.3
Date: 2012-06-07 17:40:20
Message-ID: 4FD0A1340200002500048191@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> But if you're just using regexp matching against pathnames, your
> tool will be just fine. Do your tools actually rely on the
> occasional absence of a file in what would otherwise be the usual
> sequence of files?

To save "snapshot" backups for the long term, we generate a list of
the specific WAL files needed to reach a consistent recovery point
from a given base backup. We keep monthly snapshot backups for a
year. We currently determine the first and last file needed, and
then create a list of all the WAL files to save. We error out if
any are missing, so we do skip the FF file.

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-06-07 17:40:49 Re: Early hint bit setting
Previous Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2012-06-07 17:27:48 Re: Could we replace SysV semaphores with latches?