Re: relation complex types

From: Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net>
To: Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: relation complex types
Date: 2012-06-02 19:55:00
Message-ID: 4FCA6F94.20300@darrenduncan.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jaime Casanova wrote:
> I knew that we create an entry in pg_type for every table we create,
> what i didn't know is that we actually create 2 entries.
>
> for example CREATE TABLE foo (i int); will create types foo and _foo.
> so, any reason to create 2 entries?

I don't know offhand; maybe its the corresponding row/tuple type and
table/relation type?

> anyway, what really kept my attention is that CREATE SEQUENCE also
> create an entry in pg_type. there is any reason for that?

This I'm fairly sure, is due to a sequence generator being implemented as a
table/relation-typed variable, so it has a corresponding type like the regular
table/relation-typed variables in the database.

-- Darren Duncan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2012-06-02 20:41:53 Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade from 9.0.7 to 9.1.3: duplicate key pg_authid_oid_index
Previous Message Michael Nolan 2012-06-02 16:01:16 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Send new protocol keepalive messages to standby servers.