Re: Changing the concept of a DATABASE

From: Susanne Ebrecht <susanne(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Changing the concept of a DATABASE
Date: 2012-05-22 15:36:49
Message-ID: 4FBBB291.3090401@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Am 22.05.2012 15:27, schrieb Albe Laurenz:
> If you need different applications to routinely access each other's
> tables, why not assign them to different schemas in one database?

The use case in my mind for accessing more databases is when you want to
access stuff different languages.

You only can set encoding / LC_Collate per database not per schema.

So for different languages you might need different databases to do
correct sorting / indexing.

Susanne

--
Dipl. Inf. Susanne Ebrecht - 2ndQuadrant
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-05-22 15:42:55 Re: Changing the concept of a DATABASE
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-05-22 15:30:43 Re: weird error message in sepgsql