| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Draft release notes complete |
| Date: | 2012-05-10 22:15:50 |
| Message-ID: | 4FAC3E16.9090107@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> The other problem with such an approach is that section (1) would be
> extremely duplicative of the main release-notes text. How about a
> hybrid: we continue to identify patch authors as now, that is with names
> attached to the feature/bugfix descriptions, and then have a separate
> section "Other Contributors" to recognize patch reviewers and other
> helpers?
Sounds good to me.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-05-10 22:27:00 | Re: Draft release notes complete |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-05-10 22:15:12 | Re: Draft release notes complete |