Re: synchronous_commit and remote_write

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: synchronous_commit and remote_write
Date: 2012-05-09 21:23:30
Message-ID: 4FAAE052.7020900@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> The naming is not arbitrary. -1 to changing it as suggested.
>
> It is as Aidan says, a state between receive and fsync, normally
> referred to as write.
>
> Plus the word remote denotes it is on the standby, not the local master.
>
> So both words have specific meaning, and IMHO clear meaning.

Clear to a postgres hacker, maybe. Not at *all* clear to our general users.

The natural assumption is that "remote write" means that it's written to
disk on the remote. Which is not what it means.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-05-09 21:34:26 bgwriter idle-mode behavior (was Re: Latch for the WAL writer)
Previous Message Joe Conway 2012-05-09 20:36:25 memory leak regression 9.1 versus 8.1