On 4/30/12 3:40 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> I can see that "object-oriented" has been redefined so much that it can
>> mean anything.
> Indeed. Just take a survey of programming languages.
Oh, and also: Object-Relational != Object-Oriented
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
In response to
pgsql-advocacy by date
|Next:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2012-05-01 00:20:04|
|Subject: Call for Lightning Talks for pgCon|
|Previous:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2012-04-30 22:40:52|
|Subject: Re: Should we drop the "object" from ORDBMS?|