Re: Should we drop the "object" from ORDBMS?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Should we drop the "object" from ORDBMS?
Date: 2012-04-30 22:40:52
Message-ID: 4F9F14F4.1030107@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


> I can see that "object-oriented" has been redefined so much that it can
> mean anything.

Indeed. Just take a survey of programming languages.

> So, I suppose it doesn't hurt to leave it in the
> description.

Well, it's easier to say than "Not-Just-A-Relational Database Management
System" ;-)

Or maybe Relational++ database?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2012-04-30 22:44:20 Re: Should we drop the "object" from ORDBMS?
Previous Message Edwin Quijada 2012-04-29 15:21:51 RE: [pgsql-es-ayuda] Re: Próximo evento de Comunidades PostgreSQL