Re: Future In-Core Replication

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Future In-Core Replication
Date: 2012-04-27 00:26:52
Message-ID: 4F99E7CC.9000506@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon,

> I'm beginning to work on advanced additions to in-core replication for
> PostgreSQL.
...
> Those are the basic requirements that I am trying to address. There
> are a great many important details, but the core of this is probably
> what I would call "logical replication", that is shipping changes to
> other nodes in a way that does not tie us to the same physical
> representation that recovery/streaming replication does now. Of
> course, non-physical replication can take many forms.

So, I'm a bit confused. You talk about this as "additions to in-core
replication", but then you talk about implementing logical replication,
which would NOT be an addition to Binary replication. Can you explain
what you mean?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2012-04-27 00:51:17 Re: patch submission: truncate trailing nulls from heap rows to reduce the size of the null bitmap
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-04-27 00:03:44 Re: index-only scans vs. Hot Standby, round two