| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Request to add options to tools/git_changelog |
| Date: | 2012-04-26 19:08:54 |
| Message-ID: | 4F999D46.1080906@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/26/2012 02:54 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian<bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>>> I agree adding rarely-used options to a tool doesn't make sense, but the
>>> question is what percentage of the git_changelog userbase am I?
>> 50% I think. The only thing that's really concerning me here is that
>> the reverse-sort option seems likely to be bug-inducing, and I really
>> don't grasp that it has real value. But whatever.
> He can't be more than 33% I think, since I use it regularly as well. :-)
Perhaps he was using a weighted measure. ;-)
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-04-26 19:19:04 | Re: Request to add options to tools/git_changelog |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-04-26 19:01:42 | Re: ExceptionalCondition() return type |