Re: documentation bug - missing info about unpackaged control files for extension

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: documentation bug - missing info about unpackaged control files for extension
Date: 2012-04-15 14:32:25
Message-ID: 4F8ADBF9.2030606@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 15.04.2012 13:47, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> is somewhere documented sense of foo--unpackaged--version.sql files?

See section 35.15.4. Extension Updates, paragraph starting with "The
update mechanism can be used to solve an important special case:
converting a "loose" collection of objects into an extension."

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-04-15 15:21:22 Re: query planner does not canonicalize infix operators
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2012-04-15 12:58:55 Re: Last gasp