On 04/01/2012 08:29 PM, Claudio Freire wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>>> You could try using Unix domain socket and see if the performance
>>> improves. A relevant link:
>> He said Windows. There are no Unix domain sockets on Windows. (And please
>> don't top-post)
> Windows supports named pipes, which are functionally similar, but I
> don't think pg supports them.
Correct, so telling the OP to have a look at them isn't at all helpful.
And they are not supported on all Windows platforms we support either
(specifically not on XP, AIUI).
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Віталій Тимчишин||Date: 2012-04-02 07:14:01|
|Subject: Re: database slowdown while a lot of inserts occur|
|Previous:||From: Claudio Freire||Date: 2012-04-02 00:29:35|
|Subject: Re: TCP Overhead on Local Loopback|