| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andy <angelflow(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Ofer Israeli <oferi(at)checkpoint(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: TCP Overhead on Local Loopback |
| Date: | 2012-04-02 01:11:03 |
| Message-ID: | 4F78FCA7.8010307@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 04/01/2012 08:29 PM, Claudio Freire wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>>> You could try using Unix domain socket and see if the performance
>>> improves. A relevant link:
>>
>> He said Windows. There are no Unix domain sockets on Windows. (And please
>> don't top-post)
> Windows supports named pipes, which are functionally similar, but I
> don't think pg supports them.
>
Correct, so telling the OP to have a look at them isn't at all helpful.
And they are not supported on all Windows platforms we support either
(specifically not on XP, AIUI).
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Віталій Тимчишин | 2012-04-02 07:14:01 | Re: database slowdown while a lot of inserts occur |
| Previous Message | Claudio Freire | 2012-04-02 00:29:35 | Re: TCP Overhead on Local Loopback |