| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: patch for parallel pg_dump |
| Date: | 2012-03-13 18:10:45 |
| Message-ID: | 4F5F8DA5.1030408@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/13/2012 01:53 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> I tried this actually (patch attached) but then I wanted to test it
>> and couldn't find anything that used pgpipe() on Windows.
>>
>> pg_basebackup/pg_basebackup.c is using it but it's in an #ifndef WIN32
>> and the same is true for postmaster/syslogger.c. Am I missing
>> something or has this Windows implementation become stale by now? I'll
>> append the patch but haven't adapted the pg_dump patch yet to use it.
>> Should we still go forward the way you proposed?
> Dunno. Can we get an opinion on that from one of the Windows guys?
> Andrew, Magnus?
>
>
I haven't had time to review this patch or even follow all the
discussion as I was hoping. I'll try to review the whole thing shortly.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2012-03-13 18:18:58 | Re: pg_upgrade and statistics |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-03-13 17:53:34 | Re: patch for parallel pg_dump |