> It would probably be prudent to concentrate on getting the core
> infrastructure committed first. That way, we at least know that if
> this doesn't get into 9.2, we can work on getting it into 9.3 knowing
> that once committed, people won't have to wait over a year at the very
I don't see why we can't commit the whole thing. This is way more ready
for prime-time than checksums.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com