On 02/28/2012 09:50 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> Sigh. I will have to think on this before changing anything.
> To my mind, the most straight-forward way of dealing with
> this is to remove the language from template1 altogether.
> Thereafter, the db owner must explicitly add it back in
> where required. So, the default would be no extension.
Well that is how it was prior to 9.0.
In response to
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-02-28 17:58:02|
|Subject: Re: pg_class.relnamespace NOT IN pg_namespace.oid |
|Previous:||From: James B. Byrne||Date: 2012-02-28 17:50:28|
|Subject: Re: Having a problem with RoR-3.1.1 and Pg-9.1|