Re: Having a problem with RoR-3.1.1 and Pg-9.1

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "James B(dot) Byrne" <byrnejb(at)harte-lyne(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Having a problem with RoR-3.1.1 and Pg-9.1
Date: 2012-02-28 17:52:04
Message-ID: 4F4D1444.5060807@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 02/28/2012 09:50 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
>
> Sigh. I will have to think on this before changing anything.
>
> To my mind, the most straight-forward way of dealing with
> this is to remove the language from template1 altogether.
> Thereafter, the db owner must explicitly add it back in
> where required. So, the default would be no extension.

Well that is how it was prior to 9.0.

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-02-28 17:58:02 Re: pg_class.relnamespace NOT IN pg_namespace.oid
Previous Message James B. Byrne 2012-02-28 17:50:28 Re: Having a problem with RoR-3.1.1 and Pg-9.1