| From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "James B(dot) Byrne" <byrnejb(at)harte-lyne(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Having a problem with RoR-3.1.1 and Pg-9.1 |
| Date: | 2012-02-27 18:54:27 |
| Message-ID: | 4F4BD163.30302@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 02/27/2012 08:51 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> The options seem to be run the script as the owner of the
> plpgsql EXTENSION or do not include the comment.
>
> How does one instruct pg_dump not to include the COMMENT
> for the plpgsql extension?
I am not sure pg_dump is including the COMMENT. From your previous post
the source of the COMMENT would seem to be development_structure.sql,
which I assume is coming from RoR.
>
> The case in question is the automated creation of an sql
> script to create a test database from a development
> database. The owners of the development and test
> databases are the same but this user id is not a superuser
> and it certainly does not own the plpgsql extension.
Run the script as a superuser? If the purpose is create a database from
scratch it would seem that would have to happen via a user with
sufficient privileges on all the objects in the database.
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Salisbury | 2012-02-27 19:29:43 | Re: Having a problem with RoR-3.1.1 and Pg-9.1 |
| Previous Message | Mike Blackwell | 2012-02-27 18:11:23 | Re: Does the current user have UPDATE privilege on FOO? |